Difference Between Justice In A Civilised Society And Justice In A Jungle

Amira Behari, 43, refused to reveal face at State Court In Munich

This is to bring to our notice the news link below, which explicitly explain the reason why Nnamdi Kanu disparage the reasoning capacity of some black people. The article explains the difference between justice in a civilised world and justice in the jungle otherwise seen in Nigeria.

The article is a recent publication by U.K Daily Mail, a reputable online news agency in the U.K.
It borders on similar court case between Nnamdi Kanu and the Nigerian govt, where the presiding Judge, Justice John Tsoho to the bewilderment of the whole of humanity, displayed an astounding act of ineptitude and bias on the 7th of march 2016, by rescinding his decision that masked witnesses will testify against Nnamdi Kanu the leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, which ofcourse is a clear signal of travesty of Justice, and unheard of in any civilised country.

While on the contrary, as you will find in the news below, the outstanding reasoning capacity of Thomas Mueller, a German judge, who outrightly would not hear the testimony of a masked witness. To further drive home his point, he threatened to jail the accuser for daring to testify behind her mask otherwise called niqab, irrespective of her religious inclination and belief.

With this, one would be tempted to ask, if the matter embedded in the brain of a black man is different from that of a white man. This is a case of a woman allegedly abused, much more that of a phanthom TREASONABLE FELONY.

Kindly click the link below to read full detail of this news. We would appreciate the opinion of people of like minds on this very important subject.

Click To Read News in detail:German Judge To Jail A Muslim Woman Who Refused To Remove Burka (mask) To Testify Against A Man Accused Of Abuse

It is now a case of comparing and contrasting the decision of Judge Tsoho and that of Thomas Mueller, so that the world can then decide whether they prefer Justice in a civilised country, or justice in the jungle as seen in the case of Justice John Tsoho against Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, who happen to be a prisoner of conscience.

This news did not emanate from Biafra writers, it was coincidentally stumbled upon and we thought to let the world, especially Nigerians and the likes of Judge Tsoho understand the rudiments of law which we thought he already knew, considering his position as a Justice of the Federal Republic Of Nigeria.

Related article:Corruptible Judge John Tsoho Has Brought Shame And Disgrace To The Judiciary

 We would like Judge Tsoho to explain if his decision to allow masked witnesses to testify against Nnamdi Kanu is morally and ethically viable in his profession as an administrator of justice. We want him to enlighten the public further on his decision, because it lacks every merit and only goes to show how compromised he is. We want him to tell us if his decision is obtainable in any civilised country, and we hope not to hear or read further comparison with Ivory Coast, a francophone country, whose law is not in consonance with common law as supposedly practise in Nigeria.
The time for people with conscience to decide on what kind of justice they would prefer is now.

Written By Nwosu C.S
On Behalf Of Biafra Writers